Gazea

AFL confirms State of Origin future with Victoria left out

· news

The State of Origin: A Rivalry Revived, but at What Cost?

The Australian Football League’s (AFL) recent announcement regarding the future of the State of Origin series has sparked a mix of emotions among fans and players. While the concept’s return in 2026 was met with excitement, the revelation that Victoria will be left out of the 2027 match raises questions about the AFL’s priorities.

The State of Origin concept dates back to 1993, pitting rival states against each other in a series of matches. The format was last used in 1998 before being revived this year with great success. However, the decision to exclude Victoria from the 2027 match has sparked concerns about favoritism and uneven competition.

Victoria’s absence from the upcoming series is particularly notable given its strong history in the State of Origin series. One can’t help but wonder if this decision is motivated by a desire to create more competitive matchups or simply to appease certain stakeholders.

The AFL’s assertion that locking in the structure for the next three years provides fans and stakeholders with certainty on Origin may be true, but it also reinforces the perception that the league prioritizes short-term gains over long-term sustainability. By announcing the schedule so far in advance, the AFL is essentially boxing itself into a corner, making it difficult to make changes or adjustments if circumstances change.

The State of Origin series has always been about more than just football – it’s an event that celebrates state pride and rivalries that date back decades. However, by excluding Victoria from the 2027 match, the AFL risks alienating one of its most loyal and dedicated fan bases. This could have far-reaching consequences for the league’s reputation and revenue streams.

The decision to revive the State of Origin concept in 2026 was seen as a bold move by the AFL, but it also comes with significant challenges. The format requires substantial resources, including travel, accommodations, and logistical support. Several states are already facing budget constraints and declining participation rates, raising questions about the financial implications of this decision.

The AFL’s reliance on the State of Origin series to draw in new fans and increase revenue is understandable, but it also highlights the league’s vulnerability to changing circumstances. As the popularity of other sports continues to grow, the AFL must be prepared to adapt and innovate if it wants to stay ahead of the curve.

Ultimately, the decision to exclude Victoria from the 2027 match raises more questions than answers. While the State of Origin series remains a beloved part of Australian football culture, one can’t help but wonder if the AFL’s priorities are aligned with those of its fans and stakeholders. The next few years will be crucial in determining whether this decision pays off or ultimately backfires.

The AFL must now strike a delicate balance between creating competitive matchups and appeasing its loyal fan bases. As the league continues to evolve, it would do well to remember that the State of Origin series is not just about football – it’s about community, pride, and tradition.

Reader Views

  • CM
    Columnist M. Reid · opinion columnist

    The AFL's decision to exclude Victoria from the 2027 State of Origin match raises more than just questions about fairness and competitiveness - it also highlights the league's increasing reliance on short-term fixes. By pre-emptively locking in a schedule that favors certain teams or regions, the AFL risks sacrificing long-term fan engagement and loyalty for temporary gains. It's worth considering whether this decision will ultimately pay dividends in terms of TV ratings and ticket sales, or if it'll simply lead to widespread disillusionment among fans.

  • RJ
    Reporter J. Avery · staff reporter

    The State of Origin series has long been a lightning rod for controversy, but leaving Victoria out of the 2027 match raises the stakes significantly. What's striking is the AFL's failure to consider the broader implications of this decision on interstate rivalries and fan engagement. By prioritizing short-term competitive matchups over state pride and tradition, the league risks creating a toxic atmosphere that could have long-term consequences for its relationships with Victorian fans and the wider football community. It's time for the AFL to take a step back and assess the true value of this rivalry.

  • AD
    Analyst D. Park · policy analyst

    The AFL's decision to exclude Victoria from the 2027 State of Origin match raises questions about the league's priorities and its willingness to make tough decisions for the greater good. One key consideration is the impact on grassroots football in Victoria. By snubbing one of its strongest states, the AFL may inadvertently stifle local participation and interest in the sport, ultimately undermining its own long-term growth. A more nuanced approach would be to address any perceived competitive imbalances through other means, rather than sacrificing a loyal fan base.

Related articles

More from Gazea

View as Web Story →