Gazea

Iran's Internet Shutdown Leaves Few with Access

· news

The Luxury of Access: Iran’s Internet Divide

The internet shutdown in Iran has entered its 80th day, marking the country’s longest-ever disruption to online access. Behind the headlines lies a more insidious reality: information and communication have become luxuries for the few, leaving many with desperation.

Iran’s government recently introduced “Internet Pro,” a paid service offering limited internet access to select groups. Professionals such as Chamber of Commerce members, startups, and retailers can enjoy 50 gigabytes of data for $11 – a significant sum in a country where inflation has soared above 50% and the rial has lost value against the dollar.

According to journalist Solmaz Eikder, “That’s a lot of money in Iran.” The fact that women from small towns and villages who relied on online sales to support their families have been priced out of this new system underscores the cruel irony. This is not about economic necessity; it’s about class privilege.

Newspaper Shargh and other outlets have criticized the government for transforming access to communication and information into a privilege, rather than a public right. Women who serve as primary breadwinners and students are not included among those eligible for Internet Pro, highlighting the regime’s priorities.

The Iranian government is part of a broader pattern of internet control and censorship in the region. As it tightens its grip on digital communication, similar tactics have been employed in other countries with devastating consequences. The impact of these measures extends beyond the technical realm: independent news sources are being squeezed out, leaving citizens with limited access to reliable information.

The proliferation of VPNs and censorship circumvention tools demonstrates people’s lengths to stay connected – but even these measures become less effective during prolonged shutdowns. Iran’s government promises imminent internet restoration, but its crisis management team, established to “put an end to the multiplicity of voices” in Iran’s internet policy, lacks transparency.

As developments unfold in Iran, it’s clear that access is a privilege reserved for the few, while many navigate the treacherous landscape of censorship and control.

Reader Views

  • AD
    Analyst D. Park · policy analyst

    The Internet Pro scheme is less about providing access and more about consolidating control over who has a voice online. The Iranian government's decision to price internet access out of reach for many Iranians underscores the regime's disdain for accountability and transparency. A key aspect of this policy that warrants closer examination is its impact on small business owners who rely on e-commerce platforms, not just women from rural areas. As these entrepreneurs are priced out of the market, they'll be forced to operate in the shadows, further eroding trust in institutions.

  • CS
    Correspondent S. Tan · field correspondent

    The internet shutdown in Iran is more than just a technical inconvenience; it's a deliberate tool of social control. While the government touts Internet Pro as a lifeline for professionals, its real effect is to widen the digital divide between haves and have-nots. The irony is that this tiered access system mirrors the regime's economic policies, where the affluent few reap benefits while the rest are left struggling. To truly grasp the scope of this issue, one must consider the broader implications: as online freedom shrinks, so does civic participation – a chilling prospect for Iran's democracy-starved population.

  • RJ
    Reporter J. Avery · staff reporter

    The Iranian government's decision to make internet access a luxury for the few raises questions about the value they place on their citizens' economic well-being. One practical consideration is how this will impact women who rely on online sales as a primary source of income - are they supposed to return to traditional, informal markets where prices are often fixed by men? The regime's priorities are clear: it's not just about limiting information, but also about reining in economic independence.

Related